Resilient State: Intelligence Sovereignty
July 11, 2025
In an era defined by uncertainty, complexity, and accelerating change, the future of any nation depends not only on how well it performs today but on how intelligently it prepares for tomorrow. Too often, public discourse is consumed by immediate controversies and political skirmishes, while the deeper structural levers that determine national strength, prosperity, and resilience remain poorly understood or ignored. This article seeks to reset that focus. It presents a framework of 18 metrics that serve as a blueprint for building a successful, adaptive, and sovereign future society—metrics that capture the invisible engines of state capacity, economic dynamism, and societal cohesion.
These indicators are not arbitrary or symbolic. Each one corresponds to a core systemic function that determines whether a state is able to respond to shocks, evolve in the face of disruption, and capitalize on emerging opportunities. From the speed at which a country implements reform to its ability to diversify exports, mobilize trust, adapt regulation, or develop strategic foresight—each metric reveals an essential component of national power in the 21st century. If these components are weak or misaligned, no amount of surface-level political change will yield lasting success.
Many nations fall into the trap of managing symptoms rather than root causes. By contrast, this article offers a map of the deep structures that actually govern a state’s long-term trajectory. These metrics reflect how well a society learns, adapts, creates, coordinates, anticipates, and includes. They go beyond GDP or debt ratios and instead focus on the underlying machinery of resilience, innovation, and human potential. In this sense, the framework offers a new way to look at statecraft—not as maintenance of the status quo, but as the proactive shaping of long-term flourishing.
Measurement is a form of power. What we choose to measure shapes what we prioritize, fund, and improve. The 18 metrics here serve as a strategic compass—a way for leaders, policymakers, citizens, and institutions to orient themselves toward what truly matters. They are the kinds of indicators that should live not just in obscure reports, but in dashboards guiding every national strategy, every ministry’s budget, every reform roadmap. If we get these right, we create a feedback loop that continually strengthens our society’s ability to adapt, compete, and thrive.
This is especially urgent now. Geopolitical tension, environmental volatility, technological disruption, demographic shifts, and institutional decay all conspire to challenge the modern state. In such a context, resilience cannot be reactive—it must be designed. These metrics help us diagnose current vulnerabilities and build systems that improve under pressure. They also signal to the world that we are not a passive player, but a country capable of intelligent autonomy and sovereign decision-making.
At the same time, these indicators are not purely technocratic. Many of them, such as trust, foresight, and adaptability, are as cultural as they are institutional. They require leadership, collective intelligence, and public imagination. But without a clear framework to work toward, these abstract qualities remain disconnected from policy design. That’s why this article is not just a proposal for better measurement—it is an invitation to reimagine governance itself as a dynamic, learning-based system, capable of managing both risks and possibilities with wisdom.
Ultimately, this is a call to focus national attention and effort on the things that compound—capabilities, coordination, creativity, and credibility. These are the true drivers of competitive advantage in the 21st century. The 18 metrics presented here form the beginning of a national scoreboard that actually reflects our strategic health. It is time we stop measuring what is easy and start measuring what is essential. Only then can we align the machinery of the state with the ambition of a society that wants to thrive—not just survive—in the decades to come.
Purpose: Measures how efficiently a country turns labor and capital into output.
Why it matters: It reflects system-wide innovation and organizational performance. High TFP growth means you're improving beyond simply working more or investing more.
Purpose: Assesses the quality of public services, policy implementation, and bureaucratic competence.
Why it matters: Efficient governments deliver results, attract investment, and maintain public trust in times of transformation.
Purpose: Tracks how quickly laws, strategies, or reforms are executed once passed.
Why it matters: Speed of execution is essential in fast-moving global environments, particularly for crises and innovation adoption.
Purpose: Evaluates the proportion of large, multi-year state-led projects that are completed on time and within budget.
Why it matters: Completion of such projects signals operational discipline, institutional focus, and long-term impact capacity.
Purpose: Gauges the robustness of digital government platforms (ID, payments, registries).
Why it matters: Mature digital infrastructure enables resilience, speed, and equity in delivering public services and crisis response.
Purpose: Measures institutional preparedness to govern, deploy, and use AI and data systems.
Why it matters: AI readiness is a core factor in global competitiveness and decision-making quality.
Purpose: Assesses how fast and effectively institutions respond to emergencies.
Why it matters: Timely, coordinated response is a litmus test of state resilience, especially under extreme uncertainty.
Purpose: Tracks the share of the budget dedicated to infrastructure, health, digital, and systems resilience.
Why it matters: Signals proactive governance – spending before disaster strikes, not only reacting after.
Purpose: Measures how well institutions can sense changes, seize opportunities, and reconfigure themselves.
Why it matters: A fundamental pillar of antifragility – the ability not just to survive shocks but to grow from them.
Purpose: Evaluates the flexibility of laws, policies, and organizational structures.
Why it matters: In a rapidly changing world, rigid institutions break – flexible ones adapt and lead.
Purpose: Tracks public investment in research and development as a % of GDP.
Why it matters: Indicates future competitiveness, especially in foundational technologies and science.
Purpose: Measures how well universities, companies, and the state collaborate on innovation.
Why it matters: Innovation thrives in connected ecosystems, not silos.
Purpose: Captures the variety and complexity of a country's export portfolio.
Why it matters: Diverse, complex exports mean greater economic resilience and upward mobility in global value chains.
Purpose: Tracks new business creation and the ecosystem’s capacity to support it.
Why it matters: Reflects grassroots dynamism, local problem-solving, and youth engagement.
Purpose: Measures how well a government anticipates trends and integrates them into policy.
Why it matters: Without foresight, governments react too late, missing strategic windows.
Purpose: Assesses the state’s capacity to update rules in response to new technologies and models.
Why it matters: Innovation is enabled or blocked by how quickly and flexibly laws adapt.
Purpose: Tracks the extent to which critical tech infrastructure depends on foreign systems.
Why it matters: High dependence = geopolitical and operational risk in critical moments.
Purpose: Measures public trust in institutions and the level of democratic participation.
Why it matters: Trust is a form of social capital that enables reform, stability, and national cohesion in times of change.
Total Factor Productivity (TFP) captures the true engine of long-term economic growth — improvements not driven by adding more labor or capital, but by better use of resources, technological progress, and systemic efficiency. Unlike GDP, it filters out superficial input-based growth.
Sustainable GDP growth
Innovation ROI
Competitiveness in global markets
Resilience to demographic slowdown
National productivity and wage potential
Technological diffusion
Human capital allocation
Institutional quality (e.g. governance, rule of law)
Sectoral efficiency
Infrastructure complementarity
TFP Growth Rate (%)
Direct measurement from national accounts or OECD estimates
Output per Hour Worked
A proxy when TFP is unavailable; reflects labor productivity improvements
Value Added per Worker in Knowledge-Intensive Sectors
Shows how well high-tech or high-skill sectors scale
Efficiency Gap (OECD Frontier Comparison)
Gap between domestic TFP and global productivity frontier
Rate of Resource Misallocation (%)
Quantifies GDP lost from inefficient labor or capital deployment
This index reflects how capable the government is at designing and implementing policies, delivering services, and upholding trust in institutions. A high-performing government drives development, attracts investment, and implements reform swiftly and reliably.
Policy delivery success
Citizen satisfaction and civic trust
Institutional legitimacy
Efficiency of spending
Capacity for crisis response
Public administration quality
Service delivery capability
Rule enforcement capacity
Political stability and meritocracy
Coordination across ministries and levels
World Bank Government Effectiveness Index (WGI Score)
Global benchmark of perceived institutional quality
Public Service Performance Score (internal audits / delivery KPIs)
Aggregated effectiveness of ministries and agencies
Average Policy Implementation Delay (days/months)
Tracks systemic slippage and friction in enacting decisions
Civil Servant Capability Index
Proportion of roles staffed by qualified, continuously trained officials
Public Complaint Resolution Rate (%)
Effectiveness of grievance redress systems (ombudsman, portals)
Business environments with low friction encourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and investment. Red tape, opaque regulation, and administrative inertia stifle growth and deter global players.
Business formation rate
SME scaling and survival
Investment pipeline velocity
Speed of innovation diffusion
Cost of compliance for firms
Administrative burden
Legal transparency
Time and cost of business setup
Regulatory clarity and adaptability
Contract enforcement reliability
Number of Procedures to Start a Business
Measures bureaucratic entry friction
Time to Obtain Business License (avg days)
Tracks permitting efficiency and service reliability
Tax Compliance Time (hours/year)
Reflects burden of paperwork and digital integration
Enforcement of Contracts Index
Measures trust in the legal system to resolve disputes efficiently
Share of Businesses Reporting Regulation as Major Constraint (%)
Taken from business climate surveys (e.g., World Bank Enterprise Surveys)
A state that cannot innovate risks falling behind its own society and economy. Public sector innovation reflects how well the government adapts, pilots new ideas, integrates technology, and reorganizes itself to meet modern challenges.
Responsiveness to emerging challenges (AI, pandemics, climate)
Efficiency and personalization in service delivery
Trust and legitimacy in dynamic times
Capability to collaborate with private and academic sectors
Existence of innovation labs or digital transformation offices
Budget dedicated to experimentation
AI and automation use in public services
Openness to co-creation and public feedback
Cultural incentives for risk-taking and learning in government
% of Ministries with Dedicated Innovation Units
Structural signal of innovation embeddedness
Public Sector Experimentation Budget (% of total expenditure)
How much is allocated to pilots, sandboxes, or tech trials
AI/Automation Adoption Rate in Administrative Tasks (%)
Measured by automation of back-office and decision workflows
Citizen Co-Design Participation Rate
Number of services redesigned through citizen input or design sprints
Innovation Cycle Time (Idea-to-Implementation in weeks)
Agility metric: how fast an idea becomes a service
Digital services are the main interface between the citizen and the state in the 21st century. High-quality digital services save money, scale inclusively, and provide 24/7 access to essential rights. Poor digitization results in bottlenecks and distrust.
Accessibility and inclusion in public services
Cost-effectiveness of service delivery
User trust and perception of government competence
Crisis responsiveness (e.g., digital vaccine passports, digital aid)
Interoperability of institutions
Breadth of digital services (e.g. tax filing, ID renewal, benefits)
Accessibility and inclusiveness (mobile-first, multilingual)
Integration across departments (single sign-on, data interoperability)
Digital identity system quality
Cybersecurity and privacy protection
% of Top 20 Public Services Available Fully Online
Key indicator of digital transformation progress
Average Time to Complete a Service Transaction Digitally
User-centered efficiency metric
% of Population Using Digital ID for Public Services
Penetration and trust in digital authentication
Digital Inclusion Index (Age, Region, Disability Penetration)
Measures equitable access to e-government
Service Error or Failure Rate in Digital Interfaces (%)
User experience reliability metric
Artificial Intelligence is no longer optional — it defines the next leap in state capacity, including predictive policymaking, fraud detection, and adaptive services. Maturity in AI use reflects both technical depth and institutional governance readiness.
Efficiency of operations (cost savings, fraud prevention)
Capacity for strategic foresight (predictive analytics, simulations)
Fairness and transparency in algorithmic governance
National readiness for automation in workforce and education
Number and quality of AI use cases implemented
AI ethics and governance frameworks
Public trust in automated decision-making
In-house vs outsourced AI development capabilities
Training and reskilling of public employees
Number of Government Functions Using AI Models
E.g. health risk prediction, unemployment fraud detection, smart mobility
AI Procurement Budget as % of IT Spending
Signals prioritization and depth of adoption
Existence and Scope of AI Ethics Guidelines
Binary metric + rating of comprehensiveness
% of Civil Servants Trained in AI Use or Oversight
Workforce capability readiness
Algorithmic Decision Appeal Rate (per 1,000 decisions)
Trust and accountability metric in applied AI
Crisis responsiveness reveals the real-time capacity of the state to detect, act, and coordinate across agencies under pressure. It’s the ultimate stress test of governance, often exposing latent weaknesses in logistics, communication, and decision-making hierarchies.
Civilian safety and continuity of essential services
Public trust and legitimacy during disruption
Long-term institutional reputation and reform mandates
Cross-border collaboration (e.g., in pandemics or cyberattacks)
Speed of emergency mobilization
Inter-agency coordination and command structure
Emergency communication effectiveness
Resource prepositioning and supply chain resilience
Lessons-learned cycles and adaptive feedback
Average Time from Incident to National Response Activation (hours)
Measures latency in recognizing and escalating emergencies
Emergency Simulation Completion Rate
% of planned multi-agency drills completed per year
Interagency Crisis Coordination Index
Assessed quality of coordination protocols between key ministries (e.g., Interior, Health, Defense)
Population Coverage of Real-Time Alert Systems (%)
E.g., mobile push alert systems, air raid alerts, climate threats
Post-Crisis Action Plan Completion Rate (%)
How many lessons-learned recommendations were implemented within 12 months
This measures the proportion of public spending proactively allocated to prevent breakdowns — in contrast to reactive, damage-control budgeting. Resilience is most powerful when invisible — well before disaster strikes.
Readiness for shocks across infrastructure, health, climate, or digital realms
Reduction in long-term disaster recovery costs
Fiscal credibility and insurance market confidence
Capacity to avoid compounding crises
Infrastructure redundancy investments
Digital backup and cybersecurity funding
Preventive healthcare programs
Disaster risk reduction and early warning systems
Resilient supply chain procurement frameworks
% of National Budget Allocated to Resilience-related Spending
Explicit line items for resilience, climate adaptation, digital backup, and contingency
Public Capital Expenditure on Critical Infrastructure (% of GDP)
Focused on energy, water, transportation resilience
Health Preparedness Spending per Capita (€)
E.g., stockpiles, epidemic surveillance, emergency beds
Cybersecurity Investment as % of Total IT Budget
Focuses on preemptive digital defense
Annual Growth Rate in Disaster Risk Reduction Budget (%)
Sign of long-term planning capacity
Drawn from Teece’s framework, dynamic capability in a state context reflects the ability to sense shifts, seize opportunities, and reconfigure resources and institutions as environments change. It’s a key enabler of antifragility — not just surviving, but improving through volatility.
Structural transformation of the economy
Fast reorientation of policy under external shocks
Capacity to modernize institutions and services
Flexibility in budget, personnel, legal frameworks
Strategic scanning and foresight systems
Agile resource reallocation mechanisms
Ability to scale or sunset programs based on feedback
Intersectoral mobility (people, knowledge, funding)
Use of pilots and modular structures in policy design
% of Budget Reprogrammable Within Fiscal Year
Indicates flexibility in reallocating funds to emerging priorities
Time to Deploy Emergency Policy Instruments (days)
E.g., stimulus funds, emergency procurement, executive orders
Rate of Sunset Clause Inclusion in New Legislation (%)
Built-in legal adaptability to avoid rigidity
Cross-Ministerial Staff Mobility Rate
Ability to redeploy top personnel across agencies for new challenges
Average Time from Trend Detection to Policy Response (months)
Measured via strategic foresight-to-decision feedback loops
Adaptable institutions can revise policies, reorganize workflows, and change legal frameworks in response to volatile environments. Rigidity leads to obsolescence; adaptability is key to antifragility and legitimacy during transformation.
Legal and policy agility under uncertainty
Reform feasibility and timeline
Ability to repurpose agencies and budgets
Trust in institutions during fast-moving crises or opportunities
Speed and flexibility of legislative amendments
Use of temporary or emergency legal instruments
Institutional learning loops (feedback, audit, reform)
Cross-sector coordination bodies
Capacity for rule-based vs principle-based governance
Average Time to Amend Existing Laws (months)
Legislative agility benchmark
Ratio of Fast-Track vs Standard Legislative Procedures
Indicator of emergency responsiveness and system overload
% of Policies with Built-In Review/Reform Timelines
E.g., mandatory reviews every 3–5 years
Rate of Institutional Reorganization Events per Decade
E.g., mergers, closures, agency transformations
Policy Revision Cycle Time (months)
Time between receiving audit results and implementing policy change
Public investment in R&D lays the foundation for long-term economic competitiveness, sovereign innovation, and technology diffusion — especially in foundational science and domains not yet commercially viable.
Domestic innovation pipeline
Sovereign capability in critical technologies
Spin-off entrepreneurship and startups
Talent retention and brain circulation
Technological preparedness
Government R&D spending (% of GDP)
Share of funding allocated to mission-oriented projects
Balance between basic and applied research
University and institute grant systems
State participation in advanced tech sectors (e.g., AI, biotech)
Public R&D Expenditure as % of GDP
OECD standard metric for innovation capacity
% of Public R&D Budget Allocated to Mission-Driven Programs
E.g., green transition, AI safety, pandemic readiness
Number of Government-Funded Research Institutions per Million People
Capacity and reach of public research infrastructure
Average Time from Grant Award to Project Start (months)
Efficiency and friction in funding mechanisms
Number of Patents or Startups per €1M of Public R&D
Outcome productivity metric
An effective innovation system depends on the fluid exchange of ideas, people, and projects across academia, industry, and government. Fragmentation slows innovation. Connectivity accelerates it.
Knowledge diffusion speed
Commercialization of research
Scaling of innovation into real-world impact
National resilience through cross-sector learning
Public-private partnership efficiency
Volume of university-industry collaborations
Co-funding and co-publication networks
Existence of joint innovation centers or technology parks
Policy frameworks that enable cross-sector cooperation
Exchange programs for researchers and public officials
% of R&D Projects Co-Funded by Public and Private Sector
Key proxy for collaboration health
Number of Joint Publications Between Universities and Firms
Scientific exchange and commercialization alignment
Number of Innovation Clusters or Tech Parks with Mixed Governance
E.g., university-industry-government co-managed hubs
Researcher Mobility Rate Across Sectors (%)
Academia-to-industry and vice versa over 5-year periods
Annual Count of Joint Public-Private Innovation Initiatives Launched
E.g., AI sandboxes, testbeds, or consortia
A diversified export base makes a country less vulnerable to global demand shocks, commodity cycles, or geopolitical disruption. It also reflects the economy's ability to move up value chains and tap into complex, high-margin markets.
Economic resilience and trade stability
Innovation spillovers and productivity in tradables
Foreign currency income stability
Long-term strategic autonomy
Bargaining power in trade blocs
Number of distinct product categories exported
Share of complex vs raw/low-tech exports
Number of distinct export destinations
Sophistication of export products (HS6 level)
Integration into high-tech global supply chains
Export Product Concentration Index (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index)
Measures concentration across product lines
Share of Exports in High-Complexity Sectors (%)
From Economic Complexity Index or HS codes
Number of Export Markets Exceeding $100M in Value
Indicates geographical diversification
% of Export Growth Driven by New Product Categories (last 5 years)
Innovation and adaptation metric
Global Supply Chain Integration Score
Value-added participation in multi-country production chains
A high entrepreneurship rate reflects a dynamic economy where new ideas are tested, local needs are met rapidly, and youth and talent are absorbed into productive work. It is also a proxy for economic democratization and opportunity access.
Employment generation and informal sector formalization
Innovation at the grassroots level
Absorption of AI and digital technologies in microbusinesses
Competitiveness of non-incumbent firms
Resilience to large firm failures or monopolistic stagnation
New business density per capita
Survival rate of startups
Time and cost to register a business
Entrepreneurial intention among youth
Early-stage financing availability
New Business Registrations per 1,000 People per Year
Standard GEM/OECD metric
3-Year Survival Rate of New Businesses (%)
Indicates entrepreneurial ecosystem maturity
Average Time to Register a Business (days)
Friction and access barrier indicator
% of Youth (18–34) with Entrepreneurial Intent
Survey-based; potential vs actual entrepreneurship
Venture Capital Investment as % of GDP
Enabling condition for high-growth startups
Foresight capacity measures the state’s ability to anticipate, monitor, and plan for long-term disruptions and transformations (e.g. climate, AI, demographic shifts). It’s critical for long-term strategy, resilience, and innovation governance.
National preparedness for paradigm shifts
Investment in future-oriented capabilities
Ability to frame AI, biotech, or geo shifts as opportunities
Adaptive regulatory and education reforms
Whole-of-government alignment on future scenarios
Dedicated foresight units in government
Scenario planning across ministries
Foresight integration into policy planning
Use of horizon scanning and trend monitoring tools
Partnerships with academia and think tanks
Number of Ministries with Dedicated Foresight Units or Officers
Structure and institutionalization of futures thinking
Average Time Horizon of Official Strategic Plans (years)
Short-termism vs future-proofing
% of Major Policies with Scenario Analysis Attached
Indicates foresight embedded in decision-making
Budget Allocated to Foresight Activities per Year (€)
Relative to national planning or science funding
Foresight Integration Score in National Budgeting Process
Qualitative audit-based score (low–med–high integration)
In an era of rapidly evolving technologies (AI, biotech, fintech), regulatory agility determines whether the state enables innovation or strangles it. It’s a key factor for national competitiveness in frontier industries and for trust in state flexibility.
Speed of innovation adoption
Attractiveness for R&D and tech investment
Ability to sandbox and safely experiment
Reduction of compliance overhead for new business models
Adaptive governance and resilience in ambiguity
Speed of regulatory updates
Use of experimental regulation (e.g. sandboxes)
Cross-ministry task forces for emerging technologies
Open consultation mechanisms with industry/startups
Future-readiness embedded in legal frameworks
Time from Tech Emergence to First Regulatory Framework (months)
E.g., AI, crypto, telemedicine – measures lag
Number of Active Regulatory Sandboxes in the Country
Live test zones for innovation (e.g., fintech, AI ethics)
% of Laws Updated Annually to Reflect Tech Trends
Speed of legislative responsiveness
Industry Satisfaction with Regulatory Adaptability (%)
Survey-based or from OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook
Presence of Multi-Stakeholder Regulatory Foresight Council (yes/no + frequency of meetings)
Signals coordination and horizon scanning embedded in regulation
Over-dependence on foreign technology, especially in critical infrastructure, defense, AI, or semiconductors, creates strategic vulnerabilities and reduces national autonomy in key decisions.
National cybersecurity and resilience
Ability to shape technological futures
Bargaining power in global politics and trade
Supply chain independence and robustness
Economic sovereignty in digital and energy systems
Foreign share in critical infrastructure (cloud, 5G, SCADA)
Domestic vs foreign IP ownership in tech stack
Control over AI and compute resources
Participation in open-source or joint sovereign projects
Emergency access to fallback systems
% of Critical Infrastructure Operated on Foreign Tech
E.g., telecom, cloud, grid systems – source audits
Domestic Ownership of Core Digital Infrastructure (yes/no + % control)
Cloud, data centers, OS, AI models, encryption
Import Dependency Ratio in Semiconductor and Compute Supply Chain
Customs and procurement data
% of Public Services Using Domestically Maintained Software
Cyber-sovereignty metric
Level of Participation in EU or International Sovereign Tech Initiatives
E.g., GAIA-X, EuroHPC, IPCEI programs – binary + engagement score
In resilient democracies, public legitimacy is the hidden infrastructure. Trust determines whether reforms stick, whether crisis responses succeed, and how much social capital the government can draw upon.
Willingness to comply with policy under stress
Resilience of institutions during shocks
Speed of recovery post-crisis
Support for strategic reforms and experimentation
National cohesion and polarization levels
Trust in government and public services
Citizen participation in policy formulation
Voter turnout and democratic engagement
Civil society vibrancy
Responsiveness of institutions to public feedback
% of Citizens Reporting Trust in Government
From Eurobarometer or national polling (e.g., Edelman Trust Barometer)
Voter Turnout in National and Local Elections (%)
Civic engagement benchmark
Participation Rate in Government Consultations or Citizen Assemblies
Quality of democratic feedback loops
# of Active Civil Society Organizations per Million Inhabitants
Indicator of bottom-up resilience capacity
Public Perception of Government Responsiveness Score (survey-based)
Subjective but highly predictive of legitimacy under stress
July 11, 2025
July 10, 2025
July 9, 2025